Carmelo Anthony doesn’t deserve a farewell tour – Stephen A. | First Take
Published -
- July 31, 2019
- 5:45 pm
Stephen A. Smith has a lot of love for Carmelo Anthony…
But contends that Melo doesn’t deserve a farewell tour because he has never played in the NBA Finals, let alone win an NBA championship.
What criteria should be used to determine whether a professional athlete deserves a farewell tour?
In a recent episode of ESPN’s “First Take,” Stephen A. Smith sparked controversy with his assertion that NBA player Carmelo Anthony does not deserve a farewell tour. While some may disagree with Smith’s opinion, his arguments highlight important considerations about the nature of professional sports and the criteria for honoring players.
At the heart of Smith’s argument is the question of what constitutes deserving a farewell tour. Traditionally, these tours are given to players who have had illustrious careers, achieved significant milestones, or are retiring after decades of service to their team or sport. Smith argues that Anthony does not meet these criteria. While he has had a successful career, with 10 All-Star selections and an Olympic gold medal, he has not won a championship and has not played at an elite level in recent seasons. Moreover, retiring is not Anthony’s intention; he has expressed a desire to continue playing.
Some may argue that Anthony deserves a farewell tour simply because he is a popular player and has been in the league for a long time. However, Smith rightly points out that popularity and longevity alone are not sufficient justifications for such an honor. There are many players who have been popular or played for decades who did not receive farewell tours.
Smith also stresses that farewell tours should not be given out lightly, as they can dilute the significance of the honor for those who truly deserve it. By conferring farewell tours on players who have not met the standard criteria, teams and the league risk cheapening the meaning of the honor and turning it into a mere spectacle.
Of course, Smith’s opinion is not the final word on the matter. Some may argue that Anthony has earned a farewell tour for his contributions to the sport and his teams, regardless of whether he has won a championship or meets other concrete criteria. However, Smith’s argument is a valuable reminder that such honors should be reserved for those who have truly earned them, rather than being used as a marketing ploy or a gesture of popularity.
In a way, Smith’s critique of farewell tours underscores the importance of recognizing athletes in other ways, such as through Hall of Fame induction or community service honors. Rather than relying on the spectacle of a farewell tour, these awards honor athletes’ legacies and contributions in a more meaningful and lasting way.
Ultimately, debates about farewell tours will continue to be subjective, and there will always be disagreements about who deserves such an honor. However, Smith’s argument serves as a reminder that such decisions should be based on objective criteria, rather than popular sentiment or marketing considerations. By upholding these standards, we can ensure that farewell tours remain a meaningful honor for those who truly deserve them.
